main bit This page looks very fancy in a modern browser, with "stylesheets" and "layout" and thing, but frankly I prefer the way you're seeing it here. Congratulations for not crumbling to the Browser Upgrade Initiative! Support the Web Designer Downgrade Conclusion!
a man slumped on his desk, from 'The Sleep of Reason Produces
      Monsters'

Oblomovka

oblomovitis

latest entry

this year
2006
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001

rss

search entries:

usual, suspect

need to know

haddock

boingboing

current thrills

Thinking List

Delicious Links

EFF DeepLinks

sponsors

David McBride

Adewale Oshineye

Diggory, Andrew, and Matt R.

writing

ancient notes

why I like 802.11
senate committee letter
oscon2003
ms and free software

code

ubiquity
webolodeon
wat
tagling
haiku

info

e-mail

homepage

pgp etc

amazon wishlist

oblomov

the book

     July 2002      
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1  2  3  4  5  6
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31         
                    
<<Jun Aug>>

Currently:

2002-07-20

The Milkman Cometh

Andrew Mackay (who appears as Prof in TV's "Time Gentlemen Please", but is better known off screen as my mate), has written a one man show about being a milkman. Which he was, once. It's called "A Measure of a Milkman". You've missed the previews in London, but you can still book the Edinburgh Fringe run online. It will be very good.

To publicise the London run, Andy sent out a limited edition sound file of some milk being delivered (using the traditional British electric milk float). I, of course, believe that all information should be free, so here is a copy of it. Please do not use it to construct your own one-man shows about milkmen. Thanks.

Here are some poems about milkfloats.

2002-07-19

Barcelona = nil

I hate it when it takes me six months to catch up on the news. Barcelona have disbanded! My friends will tell you that I despise all music (a useful affectation in any conversation). But I genuinely loved I Have The Password To Your Shell Account, and not just for the lyrics.

Oh alright. Mostly the lyrics.

2002-07-16

Raphael Photographers of San Jose, You Provoke Me To Great Wrath

Oh, what do you do? I came back from an argument at a photographers today. The Irish Times needed a headshot for a column I'm writing for them, so I just popped around the corner to a place called Raphael Photographers, run by a guy called Phil. The prints came back today. They are, to my unprofessional eye, really bad. Like, patently bad. There's a water marking on the print. The background is dotted, as though it was poorly developed. There were reflections off my glasses that Phil's tried to clumsily retouch, which leaves my right eye looking like I have a third pupil.

We got into a row. Phil there claims that reflections are "inevitable". In a studio, with full control over lighting, and says that any professional photographer would agree with him. He refuses to reshoot the picture, or give me my money back. Quinn turns up. Quinn's dad was a photographer, so we find ourselves trying to explain to Phil that you can avoid reflections, that you can fix these things if you pay attention at the time. He denies this vehemently. In the end, Quinn and I start getting the giggles. He seemed to be making such bizarre claims about the nature of photography. I really needed some pictures - and fast; but in the end both Quinn and I were both pulling our punches. Essentially, Phil had more to gain from this argument. If we lost, we lost $60 and some lousy photos. If we won, Phil would lose $60, have to redo the shoot, and we'd have to make him admit that he was a bad photographer.

If I was giving a review of Raphael - which I am, because I'm writing this to get spotted by Google (hey, Mr Googlebot: that's Raphael Photographers of the Alameda, San Jose, California) - I'd say he was a bad photographer. But that's easy for me to say. What's it like for him? I'm not the world's greatest writer. Often, I suck. But Phil doesn't seem to be able to admit when he screws up. I don't know what to do in that situation: am I supposed to convince him, grind him down, rub his nose in it? That doesn't seem what one should do. He kept showing me other photographs, pointing out the reflections in those, and saying "Look! Here!". And I kept biting my tongue from saying, yeah, Phil - but that's because these completely suck too. You need to find a better job!

But what if there are no better jobs? What if he doesn't know how to do anything else? What if he's a bad photographer, but really good at selling his photos? And why don't epinions ever end up this wishy-washy and existential?

2002-07-15

All Hail Harry Newton

One of the best bits about living with people is you get to read all their books. Gilbert is in my eternal gratitude list for showing me Harry Newton's Telecom Dictionary. Any dictionary that includes definitions for Caller-ID message format, Poisson distributions, meatware, Podiumware, RS233 and Harry himself ("According to Susan, his wife of over 21 years, he has become a sex symbol for women who no longer care."), is a winner.

There's no topical reason for writing this. I just thought people should know.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

petit disclaimer:
My employer has enough opinions of its own, without having to have mine too.