main bit This page looks very fancy in a modern browser, with "stylesheets" and "layout" and thing, but frankly I prefer the way you're seeing it here. Congratulations for not crumbling to the Browser Upgrade Initiative! Support the Web Designer Downgrade Conclusion!
a man slumped on his desk, from 'The Sleep of Reason Produces
      Monsters'

Oblomovka

oblomovitis

latest entry

this year
2006
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001

rss

search entries:

usual, suspect

need to know

haddock

boingboing

current thrills

Thinking List

Delicious Links

EFF DeepLinks

sponsors

David McBride

Adewale Oshineye

Diggory, Andrew, and Matt R.

writing

ancient notes

why I like 802.11
senate committee letter
oscon2003
ms and free software

code

ubiquity
webolodeon
wat
tagling
haiku

info

e-mail

homepage

pgp etc

amazon wishlist

oblomov

the book

     March 2003     
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
                   1
 2  3  4  5  6  7  8
 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31               
<<Feb Apr>>

Currently:

2003-03-17

fonts of all wisdom

So, a couple of things. First, thanks to a pressing deadline and my amazing procrastination powers, I now understand FontConfig. Did you know that if you really want to have the 7x14 Misc-Fixed bitmapped font for your gnome-terminal, you should specify "Fixed 10.5" in the profile setting? Well, now you do.

Secondly, Robin's posted a great update on the Kate Adie story below, clarifying matters a little (basically, Adie won't swear to having had those words spoken to her by the US military). It's amazing how many ongoing discussions online I now hear end with "well, why doesn't one of you just email [controversial person] and find out what they think?". And you do, and they say, and it's done.

Thirdly, Robin published his update before I published my last entry, thanks to something getting stuck between my dev server and my live server, so it looked like I was ignoring it. I shall try and fix that. Sorry.

Fourthly, I appear to think "a couple" means four.

2003-03-11

kate adie reports on the war media. war media doomed

When I first came to Silicon Valley, I joked to people in back in the UK that I wanted to be the Kate Adie of the upcoming dotcom collapse. It was a nice funny shorthand to explain less what I was doing, and more what I thought would happen to the Valley in the next few years. Adie is famously the reporter who the BBC used to send into the midst of any major disaster, all flack-jacket and pearls, from the Iranian embassy siege to Lockerbie to Tiananmen square. She's more than an icon of war reporting in the UK. She's the fifth horsemen of the apocalypse. When Kate turns up, you know you're in trouble.

So when she starts talking about a senior officer in the Pentagon telling he that all TV uplinks from journalists will be fired upon, and that the American forces are asking the press who go with them whether "they have feelings against the war" before they let them tag along, and that she is "enormously pessimistic of the chance of a decent on-the-spot reporting, as the war occurs.", I sat up and listened.

Adie says "You will get it later." I hope so. I hope someone watches it.

(from robin @ ambiguous)


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

petit disclaimer:
My employer has enough opinions of its own, without having to have mine too.