2003-05-10»
spam»
Wow. I now get over 20,000 spams
a month. Maybe that explains why I seem to get a lot more false
negatives (spam that gets through) via Spamassassin. It's the same small
percentage as ever, there's just a lot more of them.
Some spammers are definitely working on evading SA's filters. I see a
lot of spams that pretend to come from Pine and Mozilla
simultaneously - scoring them a massive minus twelve on Spamassassin's
anti-spam-o-meter. I've tweaked the reward for these tests down a bit in my
own user preferences. I've also nudged up the penalties for falling foul of
SA's new Razor2 and Bayesian modules. Spamasssassin's still a bit hesitant to
trust these much. But with the amount of spam (and normal mail) I get, my
Bayesian filters get all the training they need. Don't know why it gives Razor
such a low score - perhaps Spamassassin's overly cautious approach to false
positives is leading it to punish for accidentally catching some major mailing
lists?
% grep score ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
score USER_AGENT_PINE -0.5
score USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA -0.5
score BAYES_99 8.0
score BAYES_90 8.0
score BAYES_80 8.0
score BAYES_70 8.0
score BAYES_60 4.0
score RAZOR2_CHECK 3.0
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 3.0
what is Beverley Hughes saying?»
Beverley
Hughes is the Minister of State for Citizenship and
person in charge of investigating introducing Identity Cards into the UK. She said a
very odd thing in Parliament last week:
Mr. Paul Marsden (Shrewsbury and Atcham): If he will make a statement
on plans to introduce identity cards. [109766]
The Minister for Citizenship and Immigration (Beverley Hughes): We
published a consultation paper on entitlement cards and identity fraud on 3
July 2002. We are at the moment making a detailed assessment of the 2,000
responses received to the consultation exercise, which ended on 31 July.
Many organisations and individuals have expressed support for a card
scheme, and that has been backed up by other research on the public's
views, which we will publish alongside our response.
What's peculiar about this is that I know for a fact that at least
5029 consultation responses were submitted via stand.org.uk. Of course, that consultation ended on the 31st
January, not July, but I assume that's just a slip of the mouth from Ms
Hughes. Unless she's planning to retrospectively change the dates, and dump
several thousand voter's responses (most of which were resoundingly negative)
out into the Home Office dustbins?
I'm going to mail her later today and find out what's going on.