main bit This page looks very fancy in a modern browser, with "stylesheets" and "layout" and thing, but frankly I prefer the way you're seeing it here. Congratulations for not crumbling to the Browser Upgrade Initiative! Support the Web Designer Downgrade Conclusion!
a man slumped on his desk, from 'The Sleep of Reason Produces
      Monsters'

Oblomovka

oblomovitis

latest entry

this year
2006
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001

rss

search entries:

usual, suspect

need to know

haddock

boingboing

current thrills

Thinking List

Delicious Links

EFF DeepLinks

sponsors

David McBride

Adewale Oshineye

Diggory, Andrew, and Matt R.

writing

ancient notes

why I like 802.11
senate committee letter
oscon2003
ms and free software

code

ubiquity
webolodeon
wat
tagling
haiku

info

e-mail

homepage

pgp etc

amazon wishlist

oblomov

the book

      May 2003      
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
             1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
                    
<<Apr Jun>>

Currently:

2003-05-10

spam

Wow. I now get over 20,000 spams a month. Maybe that explains why I seem to get a lot more false negatives (spam that gets through) via Spamassassin. It's the same small percentage as ever, there's just a lot more of them.

Some spammers are definitely working on evading SA's filters. I see a lot of spams that pretend to come from Pine and Mozilla simultaneously - scoring them a massive minus twelve on Spamassassin's anti-spam-o-meter. I've tweaked the reward for these tests down a bit in my own user preferences. I've also nudged up the penalties for falling foul of SA's new Razor2 and Bayesian modules. Spamasssassin's still a bit hesitant to trust these much. But with the amount of spam (and normal mail) I get, my Bayesian filters get all the training they need. Don't know why it gives Razor such a low score - perhaps Spamassassin's overly cautious approach to false positives is leading it to punish for accidentally catching some major mailing lists?

        % grep score ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
    
score USER_AGENT_PINE -0.5
score USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA -0.5
score BAYES_99 8.0
score BAYES_90 8.0
score BAYES_80 8.0
score BAYES_70 8.0
score BAYES_60 4.0
score RAZOR2_CHECK 3.0
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 3.0

2003-05-03

links o' the past few days
what is Beverley Hughes saying?

Beverley Hughes is the Minister of State for Citizenship and person in charge of investigating introducing Identity Cards into the UK. She said a very odd thing in Parliament last week:

Mr. Paul Marsden (Shrewsbury and Atcham): If he will make a statement on plans to introduce identity cards. [109766]

The Minister for Citizenship and Immigration (Beverley Hughes): We published a consultation paper on entitlement cards and identity fraud on 3 July 2002. We are at the moment making a detailed assessment of the 2,000 responses received to the consultation exercise, which ended on 31 July. Many organisations and individuals have expressed support for a card scheme, and that has been backed up by other research on the public's views, which we will publish alongside our response.

What's peculiar about this is that I know for a fact that at least 5029 consultation responses were submitted via stand.org.uk. Of course, that consultation ended on the 31st January, not July, but I assume that's just a slip of the mouth from Ms Hughes. Unless she's planning to retrospectively change the dates, and dump several thousand voter's responses (most of which were resoundingly negative) out into the Home Office dustbins?

I'm going to mail her later today and find out what's going on.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

petit disclaimer:
My employer has enough opinions of its own, without having to have mine too.