main bit This page looks very fancy in a modern browser, with "stylesheets" and "layout" and thing, but frankly I prefer the way you're seeing it here. Congratulations for not crumbling to the Browser Upgrade Initiative! Support the Web Designer Downgrade Conclusion!
a man slumped on his desk, from 'The Sleep of Reason Produces
      Monsters'

Oblomovka

oblomovitis

latest entry

this year
2006
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001

rss

search entries:

usual, suspect

need to know

haddock

boingboing

current thrills

Thinking List

Delicious Links

EFF DeepLinks

sponsors

David McBride

Adewale Oshineye

Diggory, Andrew, and Matt R.

writing

ancient notes

why I like 802.11
senate committee letter
oscon2003
ms and free software

code

ubiquity
webolodeon
wat
tagling
haiku

info

e-mail

homepage

pgp etc

amazon wishlist

oblomov

the book

      May 2003      
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
             1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
                    
<<Apr Jun>>

Currently:

2003-05-21

we aim only to improve quality of pagerank

My friend Cait has decided to go public with her blog. It's mostly about her pregnancy, but she has wisely started off with a long rant about blogs themselves. She says they're no different from diaries, and they're just called blogs because men don't like to admit to such female pursuits. Oh, and she thinks social software is a load of unrevelatory bunkum too, and that even if it does exist, there's more to it than blogs.

I'm linking to it mainly because I find it really funny that someone should go on about how people just endlessly talk about blogs by endlessly going on about blogs. And, you know, I should point out that people who write diaries also go on about the nature of writing diaries quite a bit. I know I did in mine - and I distinctly remember Cait doing so in her old online journal. Livejournal, similarly, is full of people talking about Livejournal. It's like Children's TV as a frequent topic amongst students; it's popular, because everyone has it in common.

And what about that whole media obsession? Well, I did a search for "blogosphere", as Cait suggests, on the BBC and Guardian sites. The BBC site has two hits. One is by Bill Thompson, poo-pooing the whole thing. On the Guardian site, there are eight hits, two of which are negative, one of which is just the name of an app, and the rest have that excited tone of people using a word they've just heard. It looks like a reasonable percentage of the people talking about blogs in the press are doing exactly what Cait's doing: going on about how much people overrate them, and how there's more to social software than that. Which is to say, Cait's complaining partly about people doing what Cait's doing right now.

The other reason I'm linking to Cait, though, is because I remember thinking similiarly when I started writing Oblomvovka. I think what changed my mind and made me more interested in their more novel aspects is the effect of being linked to, and having people comment on your pages, and seeing things you've discovered percolate around the rest of the world. That really seems distinctly different from my experience of writing diaries, and much closer to the original idea of a weblog - as a commonplace book of interesting links that you've found. It's the meeting of strangers in referers, rather than the internecine world that you meet when you just read blogs and their explicit links, that I find fun. Whatever you call them, writing a blog is a lot more fun than just reading them.

And I don't care how much I talk about that. It's my blog, I can do what I want with it. Nyahhh.

i should be in bed.

2003-05-17

must try harder. see me.

2003-05-14

new spamassassin out

I have to write about something other than spam sometime. Anyway, Justin Mason wrote in, to say the new version of SA (v.2.54) severely punishes those Pine-'n'-Mozilla pretending creeps, and adds: "overly cautious my ass". Apparently Razor doesn't get high scores, because the genetic algorithm that they use to calculate the scores doesn't think it needs it. In other words, most of the Razor stuff gets caught by other traps. He also reckons I've got BAYES_60 and BAYES_70 a bit too high, and maybe he's right - I got one FP from LinkedIn the other day. On the other hand, I have problems separating give-all-your-friends-email-addresses-to-a-third-party services like LinkedIn from spam.


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

petit disclaimer:
My employer has enough opinions of its own, without having to have mine too.