<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: civil war by any other means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/</link>
	<description>Casual Dismissals from Danny O'Brien</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zero</title>
		<link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/?p=1105#comment-384</guid>
		<description>An important note about the Constitution. The document does go to great detail about what the rights of the Government are limited to but doesn&#039;t grant people rights. You might then think that the Bill of Rights defines what rights the people have but you would be wrong. The Bill of Rights only enumerates some of the rights of the people further defining what the government can&#039;t do. In the 9th amendment it specifically says that rights not listed are &quot;retained by the people.&quot;

It was a revolutionary idea at the time. That government only has limited rights and the people have all the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important note about the Constitution. The document does go to great detail about what the rights of the Government are limited to but doesn&#8217;t grant people rights. You might then think that the Bill of Rights defines what rights the people have but you would be wrong. The Bill of Rights only enumerates some of the rights of the people further defining what the government can&#8217;t do. In the 9th amendment it specifically says that rights not listed are &#8220;retained by the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was a revolutionary idea at the time. That government only has limited rights and the people have all the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimmtooth</title>
		<link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimmtooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/?p=1105#comment-383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always been this way as far as I can tell. 

You are right when you note that many of the Saints of American politics were involved in some of the sleaziest mudslinging of the nation&#039;s short history; I&#039;ve pointed this out to friends and relatives when they despair at the sight of such things. 

But now I do despair because it is becoming less and less likely that &quot;anyone can say anything&quot; both because certain people have been in power as well as the overt influence of businesses with deep pockets getting their policies implemented as federal law. There may soon come a time when an American can NOT speak his or her mind about $PUBLIC_FIGURE or $GREEDY_CORPORATION due to a modern implementation of the Alien and Sedition Act. This is one reason that the EFF&#039;s work is so important, because the EFF is on the case for at least one of the channels that we can use to express our opinions on such matters. So, best of luck with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always been this way as far as I can tell. </p>
<p>You are right when you note that many of the Saints of American politics were involved in some of the sleaziest mudslinging of the nation&#8217;s short history; I&#8217;ve pointed this out to friends and relatives when they despair at the sight of such things. </p>
<p>But now I do despair because it is becoming less and less likely that &#8220;anyone can say anything&#8221; both because certain people have been in power as well as the overt influence of businesses with deep pockets getting their policies implemented as federal law. There may soon come a time when an American can NOT speak his or her mind about $PUBLIC_FIGURE or $GREEDY_CORPORATION due to a modern implementation of the Alien and Sedition Act. This is one reason that the EFF&#8217;s work is so important, because the EFF is on the case for at least one of the channels that we can use to express our opinions on such matters. So, best of luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeH</title>
		<link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/?p=1105#comment-367</guid>
		<description>What it is, is refreshing to hear the voice of an outsider who has decided to make his home here. I wonder what de Tocqueville would say about us now, if he had the time to explore a wider, larger American than he did in the 1830s.

Though I sometimes think Americans may be more polarized than they were when I was growing up, I wonder if that&#039;s true. The political parties have always been in opposition, often not as non-violent as it is today. I, too, am amazed we survived a civil war as well as we did. I often wonder how long we have before another revolution or civil war comes along; I think we&#039;re overdue.

But I think that this is the way it is in America. This is what we get when we have free speech, and anyone can say (almost) anything. Things are unpredictable, and always have been. Sarah Palin excites me, not because of her political ideology (I oppose almost everything she stands for) but because, even more than Obama, she&#039;s a wildcard, and her very existence in the race changes the game. It&#039;s almost like playing Calvinball; whatever the rules are, they can and do frequently change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it is, is refreshing to hear the voice of an outsider who has decided to make his home here. I wonder what de Tocqueville would say about us now, if he had the time to explore a wider, larger American than he did in the 1830s.</p>
<p>Though I sometimes think Americans may be more polarized than they were when I was growing up, I wonder if that&#8217;s true. The political parties have always been in opposition, often not as non-violent as it is today. I, too, am amazed we survived a civil war as well as we did. I often wonder how long we have before another revolution or civil war comes along; I think we&#8217;re overdue.</p>
<p>But I think that this is the way it is in America. This is what we get when we have free speech, and anyone can say (almost) anything. Things are unpredictable, and always have been. Sarah Palin excites me, not because of her political ideology (I oppose almost everything she stands for) but because, even more than Obama, she&#8217;s a wildcard, and her very existence in the race changes the game. It&#8217;s almost like playing Calvinball; whatever the rules are, they can and do frequently change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick s</title>
		<link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/09/03/civil-war-by-other-means/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>nick s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/?p=1105#comment-362</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s schizoid. It&#039;s pathological. Which makes me think of the US constitution as lithium.  (&#039;The pure products of America / go crazy&#039; -- WCW.)

The wider point: where there&#039;s no filter, there&#039;s every filter. Except there are always filters: they&#039;re just hidden in the superstructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s schizoid. It&#8217;s pathological. Which makes me think of the US constitution as lithium.  (&#8216;The pure products of America / go crazy&#8217; &#8212; WCW.)</p>
<p>The wider point: where there&#8217;s no filter, there&#8217;s every filter. Except there are always filters: they&#8217;re just hidden in the superstructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
