Oblomovka

2003-08-06»

A friend of mine was going to drop by while on a trip to San Francisco in a few months. Not anymore. He’s a french citizen living in the UK. When he went to renew his passport, he discovered that the french consulate can’t provide him with a machine-readable passport. And from October the 1st, the US is refusing visa-waivers to anyone without one. You have to get a normal visa. Male visa applicants aged between 16-45 also have to fill in this new extra form, DS-157.

Questions on the new form include:

• Mother and father’s full name.
• All the countries you have entered in the last ten years (with year)
• Your last two employers (with address, telephone number and supervisor name)
• All professional, social and charitable organisations to which you belong or have belonged, contribute or have contributed or with which you work (or have worked)
• All educational institutions you attend or have attended (excluding elementary school)
• A list of specific locations you will visit in the US

Understandably, he objects to filling in this form. So he’s not coming.

There’s a lot of problems with demanding info like this, but I just want to concentrate on one.

Most American voters will never see this form, and neither will the citizens of countries that the US media listens to.

But the majority of people visiting the US will. Any male between 16-45 coming from these countries will:

And this is what they will learn of this country: that it requires that a large amount of biographical data be handed over to its government. It obligatorily requires anyone to reveal any and all organisations, political or social, of which they are a member. That its government also demands to know the location of those within its borders, and the precise time of their movements. And that men and women are to be treated differently.

I think it’s one thing to require visitors to a country to obey its laws, and comply with its values. But to propose a set of rules like this that seem to me to represent the very opposite of those values – well, that seems to be not only wrong, but a strong danger sign.

I keep on asking: if this bureacracy, this data collection, this process is necessary or even useful, why is it not applied to all Americans too? Or, if the administration is only worried about foreign terrorists, all visitors?

I cannot imagine that the percentage of terrorists in the sum of non-visa waiver countries is much larger the some total of terrorists globally. Either way, it is a tiny fraction. Why are we collecting so much data on the rest of the world? And if it is not a problem – a minor inconvienience – why don’t we subject ourselves or the majority of Europeans to it, too. What do we have to fear?

I really think that these questions should be universally required, or not required at all.

Or is it simply because we know that Europeans, and Americans have a greater voice; can declare these questions to be against their natural rights? Do they have more natural rights than others? Is that what the bill of rights means? That these rights are reserved only for American citizens and their companions? Is that what the creators of these rules propose?

I worry about this, and I worry about any number of other proposals that seem to go through without the slightest oversight by all the checks and balances of this country. And I worry that the people who are in charge don’t seem to consider what they are doing might be wrong.

The point at which the Constitution becomes little other than a crucifix one waves at powerful figures who have no understanding or sympathy with the values it represents, is a point I believe it at risk of becoming useless, even to those few who can still shelter behind it.

Comments Off on at the court of homeland security

2003-08-05»

My editor mailed me to ask about that last entry, and whether we should rewrite the piece. He said someone had pointed it out to him.

Someone, my foot. Do you see what this is? This is the Internet getting back at me again. Leave me alone, Internet, I say, waving my fist in an indescribable direction.

And I’ve finished the CD-ROM piece (it was all right), even though when I started to do some last minute research, the first site that came up for my google search terms was my own QuickTopic page. Oh very clever, Internet. Very sarcastic. Just because you don’t want to do all the work.

I’m not linking to anything on this entry, just to punish it.

Oh alright, here’s some nostalgic reminiscences about people’s first computers.

You liked me then.

Comments Off on me vs it

2003-08-04»

I’ve just spent about two weeks researching various Wi-Fi contention and multi-hop routing issues for an article. And within minutes of finishing it, Slashdot runs two stories that would have saved me most of that time. And which, anyway, now transform my ingenious point into common knowledge for most /. readers.

I hate the Net. Hates it, hates it.

Comments Off on me vs. them

2003-08-02»

Flew up to Portland and back down, which involved getting up at 5AM and stumbling home for 5PM. Was absolutely worth it though, as I slid into being a guest at my grandparents-in-law’s wedding. Annie and Russell are a fine couple and were dressed to the nines. They’re both over eighty, and have been living together for thirty years. It was beautiful, so beautiful in fact that every picture Quinn and I took ended up looking like the arresting front-cover image from a major corporate rebranding exercise.

(from Quinn’s moblog)

Can’t you see that on a double-page spread, with “For All The Colours Of Your Life: Reckitt Industrial ” underneath?

I have an even better one of Annie talking on a mobile phone while Rusell looks on, from behind a big wedding cake. I await the call from Verizon’s marketing team.

Comments Off on annie and russell

2003-08-01»

Spent the day not-writing in the brand spanking new MLK Public Library in San Jose. It’s a co-operative venture between San Jose University and the city itself. Puzzling over how to get to the uni and the town’s residents to integrate better, they decided to smersh their two (slightly poor) library collections together into one $178 million co-venture.

It’s worked amazingly well. Everything was running smoothly on the first day. They’ve combined the two catalogues (even though one used Dewey and the other the Library of Congress cataloguing system), and moved both groups of readers into a brand new building.

There are 150 data-ports in the building for laptops, about three hundred PCs for general use, and hundred laptops that can be loaned. See how long they last. (No wifi yet, though.) Looks like they’ve negotiated deals with all the SJSU academic database providers – so I can get LexisNexis ,the O’Reilly Safari. book collection, the OED and a stack of other for-money subscriptions if I access them from within the building.

The printed book collection really benefits from the merge. The usual popular introductions to non-fiction fields are all there, courtesy of the public library, and backed up with several large research collections if you’re tempted to pursue any in more detail. I love deep, wide archives like this.

The selection gets more and more ethereal as you clamber up the seven floors. There’s a browsing section on the ground floor, laid out like a bookstore, and at the very top, there are piles of SJSU theses, empty group study rooms and that hay-and-dust smell of old, hardbound stacks.

But my favourite moment was when Quinn and I were snooping around the pop fiction section. Someone leant on the “Mystery” bookshelf. It swung around, to show a false shelf of books behind with a fake secret passage.

A library with easter eggs!

Comments Off on libegg

2003-07-31»

It’s been ten years since CD-ROM drives became affordable (prices dropped from $700 to $200 in 1993), and I’ve been asked to write a piece about the rise (and fall) (and rise) of the CD-ROM as a medium. As part of this, I’m doing a little retrospective of the best CD-ROMs of the decade.

It feels a bit odd to hive-off CD-ROM as a category. There’s something very 1996 about doing that. It does mean something, though: a package that depends on permanent storage rather than pulling data off the Net; whose form is melded around slow-access times, and perhaps nodding to that “digital book” ideal.

I’m guess I’m looking for apps that exploited the CD-ROM form well, and perhaps lived up to that all-to-brief moment of being the forefront of “interactive multimedia”, but have still managed to survive the test of time.

Me, I have a soft-spot for Voyager’s Spinal Tap, which not only set the standard for video CD-ROM, but I think defined how DVD bonus material would be executed. And I think I’ll include the original Myst (even though I’m a bit loathe to include every game too big to fit on floppies), because its rendered gameplay was such a ingenious exploitation of the large size of CD-ROMs, rather than clever programming. And then there’s the You Don’t Know Jack, spin-offs of which I still see for sale.

What are your favourites? All suggestions ungratefully purloined.

Discuss!

Comments Off on you commendo

2003-07-30»

Nigel Rantor is collecting datapoints to build an open 3D map of the London Underground, and is looking for suggestions as to what to do with it. Geowankers, assemble!

Comments Off on the london underground in cartesian triplets

2003-07-29»

Oh, shut up, yes, it’s another blog entry about blogs. I’m interested, all right?

Maciej’s team have done the first number-crunching I could think of with his Blog Census stats. How many blogs are actively updated? Roughly two-thirds, it seems -65%. The rest are either abandoned (where the blogger says he’s quitting – 4%), no longer updated (no posts in two months – 16%), sites that just contain test posts (8%), 404ing, or otherwise inaccessible.

Comments Off on blog activity

2003-07-27»

RIAA-style revealing of subscriber identities without even sub poenas? And worse? What fresh hell is this?

Comments Off on the european enforcement directive

I’m spending the day listening to my own cackling voice asking dumb questions of smart people. They’re all very quiet people, too, and I foolishly left the laptop recording with the noisy mains plugged-in, so all I can hear is my booming idiocy and then them speaking as though through a lawnmower, darkly.

That said, this piece is going better than most. My expectations of what my interviewees would say have not been so undermined that I’ll have to rejig the entire skeleton structure I originally had in mind. But I’ve still been sufficiently surprised by what they have to say that I know I’m not just imposing my naive pre-story belief onto the facts.

Plus, I’m getting to write about new RFCs in a mainstream publication, which is always to the good.

Comments Off on transcribing phone interviews