Oblomovka

2002-11-25»

Seth has linked to a Google search for “Moen’s Law of Bicycles”, in order to explain what “Moen’s Law Of Bicycles” is. Unfortunately, the blogosphere being what it is, Seth’s own diary entry is now the number one hit on his own Google search. The second entry is currently another blog entry from someone else, noting that Seth is now the number one hit on his own search. In an attempt to prevent the link spiralling into meta-uselessness, I’ll now invoke fair use to quote Moen’s Law of Bicycles in its entirety, and hope my overuse of the phrease “Moen’s Law of Bicycles” will throw this somewhere near the top:

MOEN’S LAW OF BICYCLES

In the mid-1970s, bicycles suddenly became very popular in the USA. Massive numbers of people were suddenly in the market, few of them knowing anything about bicycles, and many could distinguish poorly if at all between good equipment and bad; good customer service and bad. Consequently, poorly made bicycles (which cost less to make) undercut well made ones (and poor customer service out-earned the good variety), because their superior value ceased to be perceived. Over time, the overall quality of available bicycles declined considerably, almost entirely because of this dynamic with customers, recovering only after the fad ended, years later.

Moen’s Law holds that “Good customers make for good products.” Quality thrives only when people can tell the difference. When they haven’t a clue about the products and how they work, schlock merchandise prevails.

(From A First Look At You-Know-What, Blue Notes, Sept/October 1995 Issue)

Comments Off on moen’s law of bicycles

– nobody seems to know about oral rehydration therapy.

Stuck in the Basque country in the eighties with not much of the language and a lot of food poisoning, ORT kept me off an intravenous drip and nursed me back to life in a couple of days. Since then, whenever I’ve had really bad diarrhea, oral rehydration salts been the first thing I’ve bought or mixed up to get me back on my feet.

ORT is was described by the Lancet as “the most important medical advance this century. It was discovered by US researchers in 1968, and is now used by 38% of all diarrhea cases in the world, saving millions of lives. It’s also fantastically cheap – it’s just a magic ratio of sodium and glucose and water.

Unfortunately, I have a really bad memory, so I can never remember what the magic ratio is. So, for the record, it’s:

• 1 Liter of Clean Water
• One level teaspoon of salt
• Eight level teaspoons of sugar

Mix it up well, and drink in small sips. It’s as easy as that.

I was stumbling around New York, very ill, this week, and asked in a pharmacy about ORT. They said they’d never heard of it, and to buy some Gatorade. Apart from the fact that Gatorade is more expensive, it just isn’t the same thing. Gatorade has too much sugar and not enough salt for the magic to work.

In cases of diarrhea, it’s really difficult to get water into the human body, because the usual method – absorption through the intestinal wall – is broken. ORT works because the glucose provides an alternative transport across the intestinal wall for the sodium, which increases the concentrate of the salts behind the wall, which means the water moves across far more easily.

But you need to get the ratios right. Gatorade doesn’t have it. Apparently the kid’s electrolyte fluids (like Pedialyte and Kaolectrolyte) are better, but even they seem to be full of weirdness (like Pedialyte ‘goes bad’ very quickly). And why just for children? I don’t get it.

Comments Off on weird things about america, #3,318

DELTASS looks like a real life Thunderbird 5. I hope John Tracy is okay up there.

Comments Off on international rescue

I’ve let this lie fallow for far too long, but perhaps RSS feeds mean that not watering a blog doesn’t mean that it dies beyond recovery.

Aaanyway, the BBC is looking for someone to stand up against the boys from Microsoft and Intel when they explain how great Palladium and LaGrande will be for consumers, producers, and – oh, but who else could there be? It’s for a TV interview in the UK next week, and they’ve already asked Alan Cox and Ross Anderson. I can’t think of anyone off the top of my head, which is generally an indication that I’m being dense. Do you know someone? Are you that someone? Let me know, and I’ll mail the BBC.

Hooray for the Lazyweb!

Comments Off on who would you like to talk against palladium?

2002-11-11»

I knew PK of PKZIP died in nasty circumstances. But was it all just payback for ZIP’s own dodgy past?

Comments Off on zip it. zip. it.

RTE says that Trinity College are considering suing Lucas for nicking the likeness of the Long Room Library in Trinity for re-use as the Jedi Archive in Attack of The Clones. (Thanks, Karlin!)

Comments Off on are the jedi irish?

2002-11-07»

I had no idea National Airlines went bust yesterday. Which is a bit of a pain as it strands Gilbert on the other side of the continent. I pity Dulles staff today – dealing with a squadron of stranded Bay Area sysadmins home from LISA is not going to be fun. Those people do not appreciate having their tickets marked INVALID.

Comments Off on side-effects of getting all your news from google

2002-11-06»

This falls into the blog as spare brain category. Michigan University has a great and impartial Iraq War resources page, if you’re interested in that kind of thing. Which, I guess, we have no choice but to be these days. (From the Left-Right anti-war blog Stand Down, a useful resource in itself.)

Comments Off on resources on the iraq war debate

2002-11-05»

This story – about a seemingly fake set of scientific papers that managed to get published in reputable scientific journals – just gets more and more weird. Apparently the twins appear quite sincere in their belief that their paper has legitimate merit (rather than just being the Anti-Sokals that I thought they were initially). And they even have bodacious fans!

The sociological milieu of the affair is rich in color and personalities. The Bogdanovs have been described as “charismatic” and and “persuasive.” One of the juicier details is that the Bogdanov twins actually have FANS – scores of beautiful, nubile young women – who attend their seminars thereby delighting the other physicists – distracting them from theoretical to applied pysics. The Bogdanovs have political cachet – even the support of the French Minister of education. In addition to this, because of their prominence, the Bogdanov brothers have brought various publishing houses into the fray, making for a general circus-like atmosphere in the normally subdued and monkly Ivory towers of science.

Mind you, the site that’s from also talks about a COINTELPRO conspiracy to hold back science. We appear to be entering the really dark, conspiracy-laden corners of sci.physics here. Or at least slightly more French than I’m accustomed to.

Comments Off on more on the bogdanov twins

Josh’s friend Chris got hold of his marketing data under the Data Protection Act. Now he’s selling it to the highest bidder on e-bay.

Lloyds TSB: Approximately 500 pages of personal data including an analysis of banking products they believe I might be interested in. Also includes overdraft limit maintenance history (hand written), risk management history data (93 pages) and a full list of letters sent over the previous 5 years (completed by hand). All data and codes come with explanatory notes provided by Lloyds TSB. Original cost £ 10.

Sainsbury’s: Dated 12 July 2001, this data is split into five separate reports. Report 1. Operational report (name and address etc.) Report 2. Operational report again, with summarised details and the last 31 transactions on the card. Report 3. Drawn from the main data repository and includes the ‘Acorn’ standard marketing categorisation. Includes the assumption that we are ‘better-off inner-city executives living in a partially gentrified multi-ethnic area’. Report 4. Shows the transactions made using our reward card. Report 5. This is a list of EVERYTHING we bought from Sainsbury’s over a 3 year period – where we bought it and how much we paid. This data has been co-produced with my partner whose individual data has been removed.

Comments Off on <oliver>who will buy my personal data?</oliver>